Tianjin Lishen vs Farasis Energy Batteries Comparison

Tianjin Lishen vs Farasis Energy Batteries offers a range of battery models with distinct specifications and performance characteristics.

While Tianjin Lishen focuses on a broad capacity range and robust circulation performance, Farasis Energy provides detailed options with varying dimensions, capacities, and energy densities tailored to different applications.

Tianjin-Lishen-vs-Farasis-Energy-Batteries
Tianjin-Lishen-vs-Farasis-Energy-Batteries

FeatureTianjin Lishen BatteryFarasis Energy Battery
ModelGeneral SpecificationsP32, P53, P55
Dimensions (mm)Length: 45 – 180, Width: 30 – 120, Thickness: 2.0 – 10P32: 161 x 231 x 6.05, P53: 161 x 231 x 10, P55: 316 x 103 x 10.6
Weight (g)Not specifiedP32: 498 ±15, P53: 800 ±15, P55: 758 ±15
Capacity Range1000mAh – 6000mAhP32: 33.3Ah, P53: 55.5Ah, P55: 57.3Ah
Energy Density500 – 650 Wh/LP32: 249 Wh/kg, P53: 258 Wh/kg, P55: 283 Wh/kg
Chemistry (Cathode/Anode)Not specifiedNCM 6 Series / Graphite
Voltage Range (Vdc)Not specified2.75 – 4.3 (P32, P53), 2.75 – 4.4 (P55)
Circulation Performance25℃: 1000 cycles, 45℃: 500 cyclesNot specified
Recommended Charge Time (min)Not specified30 – 35 (10% to 80%)
StatusNot specifiedProduction
Table: Comparison of Tianjin Lishen vs Farasis Energy Batteries

Read more comparisons

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *